The ANOC letter, read like a spec sheet: the seven lines that matter
September 15, 2026
Listen Now
Subscribe
Ready to talk with an advisor?
The advisors at American Retirement Advisors have been having these conversations for over 25 years. A no-cost discovery session is the fastest way to find out where you actually stand.
Schedule a Discovery Session
Show Notes
Eddie and Betty's Conversation
Welcome to The American Retirement Advisor. I'm Betty, and Eddie's here with me in the studio today, and we are digging into something that lands in millions of mailboxes every fall and gets ignored by almost everyone. We're talking about the Medicare Annual Notice of Change, that booklet that shows up in September, the one most people glance at and set aside because the first sentence says if you do nothing you keep what you have. And today we are making the case that that is the most expensive sentence in healthcare for retirees.
Good to be here. And I want to say right away, we're basing this whole conversation on a piece written by Ian Schaeffer, who is the COO over at American Retirement Advisors. He describes himself as an engineer, not an advisor, and he reads documents the way he reads a spec sheet. What changed, by how much, and what does it cost me. That framing matters because it's not theoretical. He's not describing what could happen in some edge case. He's describing what is in the letter that you already received.
And he opens with two real callers. Real situations. One person was getting the annual notice every year about a plan that wasn't changing, so she'd just stopped reading it. And another person couldn't figure out why her friend's Medicare premium went up but hers didn't. And Ian Schaeffer's point is, the answer to both questions was in the letter. Nobody read page two.
That detail about page two is not a throwaway line. The first page tells you the deadline and tells you that doing nothing keeps you enrolled. Both of those things are true. And both of them can cost you money. Because what's on page two is the actual comparison table, this year versus next year, across seven specific rows. That's the spec sheet, as Ian calls it. And most people never get there.
So let's back up for a second. What is this letter, technically? When does it have to show up?
So the regulation requires plans to notify all enrollees at least fifteen days before the Annual Coordinated Election Period begins. That period starts October 15. So plans have to have this notice in your hands by September 30. Medicare's own description of it says the notice includes any changes in coverage, costs, and more that will be effective in January. It is a preview of what you are agreeing to if you stay put.
And there's a companion document too, right? Something longer?
The Evidence of Coverage. That's the full contract. The notice of change is the summary, and it actually says so on page one, that this is only a summary and that more detail about costs, benefits, and rules is in the Evidence of Coverage. The Evidence of Coverage has to reach you by October 15, the first day of that election period. So if you get the short one first and the long one comes a couple weeks later, that's normal. That's by design.
Now here is something I didn't know until I read Ian Schaeffer's piece. These letters aren't written differently by every insurance company. They all use the same government template.
This is the part that makes reading the article genuinely useful for any listener, regardless of which plan they're on. Medicare publishes what's called the Model Annual Notice of Change, and every plan builds its letter from that template. Ian pulled the 2027 version. So the sections are in the same order, the table looks the same, the language in many places is identical. Once you know the layout, you know it for any plan.
Walk me through it. What are those seven rows?
Monthly plan premium, deductible, maximum out-of-pocket, primary care office visits, specialist office visits, inpatient hospital stays, and Part D drug coverage. Two columns next to each row: this year, next year. You can see at a glance where something moved. Then behind the table are seven sections, one through seven, and they correspond to those rows. Ian's advice is read the table first, then go read only the sections where a number actually changed. You don't have to read the whole booklet. You read the sections where something moved.
That is such a practical way to approach it. And then he builds this illustration of a plan with a premium that didn't change at all, and I think this is the most important thing in the whole piece, so I want to make sure we really sit with it.
He's careful to say these are made-up numbers, not any real plan. But the shape of the math is the point. So here's the scenario. Monthly premium: zero dollars, same as last year. Zero. Most people see that and stop reading, because nothing changed. But in his example, the specialist visit copay goes from forty dollars to fifty dollars. Eight specialist visits in a year is not unusual for someone managing even one chronic condition. That's eighty dollars more for the year, just from that one row.
And then there's the drug tier change.
One daily medication moves from tier two to tier three. The cost goes from ten dollars a month to forty-seven dollars a month. That's thirty-seven dollars more per month, times twelve, which is four hundred and forty-four dollars a year. The drug didn't disappear from the formulary. It didn't get discontinued. It just moved one tier. And the total for an ordinary year on that plan is five hundred and twenty-four dollars more expensive than last year. On a plan whose premium did not change.
That's a normal year. What does a hard year look like?
His table also shows the maximum out-of-pocket jumping from fifty-five hundred to sixty-seven hundred. In a good year, that doesn't matter, you don't hit the cap. But in a bad year, a hospital stay, a surgery, you're exposed to twelve hundred dollars more than you thought. So stack that on top of what we were just talking about with the tier change, and a bad year on that same plan lands you seventeen hundred dollars deeper in the hole than the year before. And page one still says you can keep it by doing nothing. Which is true. It just costs more.
So the letter is not lying to you. It's just not running the math for you.
It describes what's changing. It doesn't add it up for you in the context of your own life. That's the job the article is trying to help people do for themselves.
Now Ian Schaeffer says this is the single most common misunderstanding he hears, the idea of the two meters. Can you explain what that means?
So most people think there is one out-of-pocket maximum on a Medicare Advantage plan. There are two, and the template says it plainly: plan premiums and costs for prescription drugs don't count toward your maximum out-of-pocket amount. So you have the medical cap, which is Section 1.2 in the letter, and you have a completely separate drug cap, which is on the Part D side in Sections 1.6 and 1.7. Two caps, two separate meters filling up independently. If you have a bad medical year AND a high drug year, you could be approaching both caps at the same time.
And what are the ceilings Medicare itself has set for those caps?
So Ian lays out the numbers from Medicare's published guidance. For 2026, the in-network out-of-pocket limit on an Advantage plan may not exceed ninety-two hundred and fifty dollars. The combined in-network and out-of-network limit is thirteen thousand nine hundred. For 2027, those go to ninety-eight fifty in-network and fourteen thousand eight hundred combined. These are ceilings. Most plans sit below those numbers. Your actual number is in the table.
And on the drug side?
For 2026 the out-of-pocket cap on covered Part D drugs is twenty-one hundred dollars. The highest deductible a drug plan can charge is six fifteen. For 2027 those go to twenty-four hundred and seven hundred respectively. And Ian makes a key distinction: the twenty-four hundred dollar drug cap is the same for everyone, that's federal, not plan-specific. But the deductible is a ceiling, and most plans are below it. Which is exactly why you have to look at your own table.
Okay so now let's talk about the two sections that people skip. Because I think even people who do read their notice of change are probably not reading these.
Section 1.3 is your provider network. And the template language Ian quotes is blunt. It says the network has changed for next year, and tells you to review the 2027 Provider Directory to see if your providers are still in network. Your primary care doctor, your specialists, your hospital. All of them. Nobody checks. You have to check.
Because if they dropped out of the network and you don't know it, you could be paying out-of-network costs all year before you even realize what happened.
And Section 1.3 also contains something a lot of people don't know, which is that it can change during the year, not just at open enrollment. If your provider leaves mid-year, you may be entitled to a special enrollment period. The regulatory citation Ian gives for that is 42 CFR 422.111(e), for anyone who wants to look it up. But more practically, the notice tells you that the option exists. You just have to have read it.
What about Section 1.6? That's the drug list.
This is where the tier change lives. The template language says plans can remove or add drugs, change restrictions on coverage, or move a drug to a different cost-sharing tier. And Ian's point is that last clause is doing a lot of work. A drug doesn't have to be removed from the formulary to get dramatically more expensive. It only has to move one tier. That's the forty-four dollars a month jump in his example. Hiding in plain sight in Section 1.6.
And plans can change the drug list mid-year too, not just at open enrollment.
They can. Medicare's rule is that they must notify you of any changes to their drug list that affect drugs you're taking. Typically at least thirty days' notice, or a month's supply of the drug plus written notice. But there are two exceptions where the change can happen without advance warning: if a brand drug is being swapped for its generic or biosimilar, and if a drug is pulled from the market for safety reasons. The template actually acknowledges this. It says you might get information on the specific change after the change is already made. So if your medication changed without warning, you may not have been wronged. You may have just met one of those exceptions.
That's actually really important to know. Because I can imagine how alarming that would feel, to go pick up a prescription and find out something is different, and not understand why.
It could feel like an error. And sometimes it is worth questioning. But sometimes it is the rule operating exactly as written. Knowing the difference saves a lot of stress.
So let's say someone is listening to this and they want to do this right. They've got their notice of change, or they're about to look for it. What does Ian Schaeffer say to actually do with it?
The practical step he points to is Medicare's own calendar, which has an October 1 entry that says: get ready for open enrollment, review any notices from your current plan about cost and benefit changes for next year, then go to Medicare.gov/plan-compare to preview plan options. So you're doing two things in parallel. You're reading your current plan's table carefully. And you're looking at what else is available for 2027 in your county, because plan availability varies by county. He's explicit about that.
And if the letter never arrived? Or if someone went paperless and it's buried in an email somewhere?
Ian says the plan is required to get you one, and you can ask for it. That's worth knowing, because a lot of people have notices sitting in an inbox they haven't opened. And he flags one more situation: if the letter says your plan is ending rather than changing, that is a different document with different rights attached to it. He refers to a previous piece in his series that covers that scenario. So if the letter you got is about a plan termination, the math we've been talking about is not your primary concern.
Okay, and then Ian closes with what a Certified Medicare Planner actually does with this document. And I think this is a really honest description of why you might not want to just do all of this yourself.
He's specific about it, which I appreciate. He says they don't read the letter, they read the table, and then they read Sections 1.3 and 1.6 against your actual doctors and your actual prescriptions. Not a hypothetical member's doctors. Yours. They know the difference between the ceiling Medicare publishes and the number your specific plan chose. And Ian says a good planner never just tells you your deductible will be seven hundred dollars, because seven hundred is the maximum any plan can charge in 2027, and most plans are below that.
So knowing the ceiling is different from knowing your number.
And that's exactly the arithmetic the planner runs, the way Ian ran it in his example, for the year you actually had, not the idealized year in the brochure. And they run it for both meters, the medical side and the drug side separately. And then they compare that against the 2027 options the day that list goes up. That's the full picture.
If someone wants to sit down with a Certified Medicare Planner and do exactly that, what should they do?
The team at American Retirement Advisors is at 602-281-3898. And Ian also mentions in-person workshops coming up, at no cost to you. October 2, Foothills Library in Glendale at ten-thirty in the morning, and Mustang Library in Scottsdale at two-thirty in the afternoon. You can register at 123easymedicare.com/medicare-workshop or by calling 877-220-1089.
I want to go back to something for a second, because I think there's a version of this conversation where people hear all of this and think, I'll look at it, but my plan probably didn't really change much. And that five hundred and twenty-four dollar example is what I keep thinking about, because the premium was zero both years. The plan looked identical on the headline number.
That's the trap. It's the thing people look at because it's the one they pay every month and feel. A drug tier change is invisible until you're standing at the pharmacy counter. A specialist copay increase is invisible until January when you go to your first appointment. The annual total accumulates quietly. Nobody sends you a running tally.
And Ian notes that a plan with no premium of its own still means you're paying Part B. So the zero-premium framing can be a little misleading in general.
He's clear about that. A zero-dollar plan cost doesn't mean your Medicare costs are zero. Part B is still there. And depending on your income, your Part B rate may be higher than your neighbor's. That's a separate layer entirely, and the notice of change doesn't cover it. If you have questions about how that interacts with your specific situation, that's exactly the kind of thing I'd write down and bring to one of the advisors at American Retirement Advisors, because the specific rules there involve income thresholds I wouldn't want to get wrong on air.
That's a good point. There are layers here that really do require someone looking at your whole picture, not just the letter.
And Ian is honest about that too. He writes as an engineer who reads the document as a spec sheet. He says very clearly at the top: I am not an advisor. The advisors turn it into a decision for your actual plan. His job, as he frames it, is to show you where to look. Which he does exceptionally well.
One more thing worth pausing on before we move on, and that's the two-meter thing. I want to say it one more time because I think it will genuinely surprise people. Your drug costs do not count toward your medical out-of-pocket maximum. They are tracked separately. So in a rough year where you have both significant medical expenses and high drug costs, both meters can be filling up at the same time.
And the plan's own template language spells that out word for word. Ian quotes it directly from the document -- the part we flagged a minute ago about premiums and drug costs living outside that out-of-pocket meter entirely. This is not fine print someone buried. It's right there in plain language. The problem is nobody reads to that section.
Which is why a Certified Medicare Planner running both calculations side by side is not a luxury. For a lot of people managing chronic conditions or multiple prescriptions, it's just the accurate picture of what the year will cost.
And it lets you make the comparison fairly. If you're weighing your current plan against a 2027 option, you need to run both meters on both plans. Otherwise you might pick the plan with the lower premium and end up spending more on the year.
So to pull it all together: when the letter arrives, or when you find it in your email, don't stop at page one. Go straight to the table on page two. Seven rows, two columns. Look for the numbers that moved. Then read only the sections behind the ones that changed. Pay special attention to Section 1.3 for your doctors and Section 1.6 for your drugs. Do the math for a normal year, not just a good one. And remember the two meters are counting separately.
And then compare what you find against the 2027 options at Medicare.gov/plan-compare before October 15. That's your window.
All of this is based on Ian Schaeffer's piece in the Healthcare in Retirement series. He did the work of pulling the actual template, the actual regulatory language, the actual ceiling numbers from Medicare's published guidance. Go find that article and read it alongside your letter. And if you want someone to do this with you, with your doctors, your prescriptions, and your actual numbers from the past year, call the team at American Retirement Advisors. The number is 602-281-3898. Or come to a workshop on October 2, at no cost to you, and register at 123easymedicare.com/medicare-workshop. This is the kind of thing that is worth getting right. We'll see you there.