Is your neighbor's plan right for you?
October 27, 2026
Listen Now
Subscribe
Go Deeper
Read next on our site:
- Your plan letter came: what to do before December 7What you can change from October 15 to December 7, a five-step checklist, key dates and plain answers.
Ready to talk with an advisor?
The advisors at American Retirement Advisors have been having these conversations for over 25 years. A no-cost discovery session is the fastest way to find out where you actually stand.
Schedule a Discovery Session
Show Notes
Eddie and Betty's Conversation
Welcome to The American Retirement Advisor podcast. I'm Betty, and Eddie is here with me in the studio today, which means we are about to get into some numbers whether I like it or not.
You say that like it's a threat. It's the Annual Enrollment Period. This is the good stuff.
Okay, this topic is so relatable. Picture it: you're standing at a barbecue, someone raves about their plan, and you think, oh, maybe I should just get what she has.
Everyone has done that. It feels like the smart shortcut. Someone you trust loves their plan, so why reinvent the wheel?
And Ian Schaeffer's whole point is that it might be completely wrong for you. Not because your neighbor is giving you bad advice, but because her life isn't your life.
Right. And this came directly out of their Fiscal Fridays event. One of the panelists said it plainly: the plan your neighbor swears by is not the right plan for you.
And David Schaeffer told the room, I know every one of you is unique. Which sounds obvious until you realize how many people make this decision based on a recommendation from someone at a coffee shop.
Word of mouth is how a lot of people pick a plan. And it works great if two people happen to have the same doctors, the same drugs, the same lifestyle. Which is almost never.
So Ian Schaeffer lays out four things that make a plan personal, and the first one is who you see. Walk me through why that one trips people up.
So with a lot of Medicare Advantage plans especially, there's a network. Certain doctors and hospitals are in it, and others aren't. Your neighbor's doctors might be in the network. Yours might not.
And you wouldn't know until you tried to make an appointment and found out.
Exactly, and at that point you've already enrolled. The piece is really clear on this: you have to check your own doctors, by name, for next year. Not this year. Next year, because networks can change.
That's sneaky. So even if your doctor was in the plan this year, that doesn't guarantee anything for January.
Correct. Which is why this isn't a one-and-done decision. You're really doing this check every single year during enrollment.
Okay, the second thing is your drugs, and this is the one that got me when I read it. Because I assumed a drug was a drug. If I take something, it costs what it costs.
Oh no. Every plan has its own list of what's covered, and then they sort those into tiers. Different tiers cost different amounts. The same medication can be on a completely different tier depending on which plan you're in.
Wait, so the exact same pill could cost me twenty dollars on one plan and eighty on another?
That's the idea. And the article makes a really vivid point about this. If your neighbor takes one pill a day and you take five, the same plan can feel completely different to each of you. She's barely touching the drug coverage. You're leaning on it hard.
So she genuinely loves the plan and isn't lying to you. It's just that her experience of it has almost nothing to do with yours.
That's it. Same plan, two totally different realities.
There's a real-life example in the piece that I want to get to, because it's the one that really made me stop. A couple married 38 years.
Yes. She takes seven prescriptions and sees three specialists. He takes one pill and sees his doctor twice a year. Two people who have shared a life for nearly four decades, and their medical needs are almost nothing alike.
And the point the article makes is that Medicare coverage is individual. So they don't have to be on the same plan.
Which surprises a lot of people. You're married, you assume you're on the same everything. But with that system, each person can be on whatever plan actually fits them.
So she picks the plan that handles seven prescriptions and three specialists well, and he picks the plan that fits someone who barely uses it.
Right. And those are probably not the same plan. The coverage that's really rich and worth it for her might be complete overkill for him.
This is where I feel like people need to hear this, because I think a lot of couples just assume they'll sign up for the same thing and move on.
And that can cost them real money. Or worse, it means one of them ends up with a plan that doesn't cover what they actually need.
Okay, the fourth piece is where you spend your time. And this one surprised me because I wasn't thinking about it geographically at all.
So Advantage plans are built around a local network. They're designed for a specific area. If you split your year between, say, Arizona and somewhere else, or you travel a lot to see family, you have to ask how the plan works when you're not in your home network.
Because a neighbor who never leaves town has never had to ask that question. It's worked perfectly for her and she has no idea it could be an issue.
She's not hiding anything. It just hadn't crossed her mind. For you, it might be the most important item on the list.
So you could be sitting in another state visiting grandkids, need to see a doctor, and find out you're outside your network.
And that is not the moment you want to be figuring that out. The time to ask is before December 7th, not from an urgent care waiting room.
Alright, so Ian Schaeffer gives people three better questions to ask instead of just asking their neighbor which plan they have. And I want to go through these because I think they're genuinely useful.
They're good. The first one is: are my doctors in it next year? And the piece is very specific about that word, next year. Not this year. Things change and you can't assume continuity.
The second question is: what would my drugs cost on it, at my pharmacy? And the article says using your real list, the right names, strengths, and forms. Not just the general drug name.
Because the same medication in a different strength or a different form might be on a different tier. The specifics matter a lot.
And the third question is the one I would never have thought to ask on my own.
What does a bad year actually cost me? Not the monthly premium, but the most you could end up paying if your health actually takes a turn. The ceiling.
Because a low premium can feel like a great deal right up until the year you need a lot of care.
And then suddenly the math looks very different. It was low, but you're hitting that ceiling and it is not what you planned for.
It's like budgeting for a road trip by only looking at the gas price and forgetting that a flat tire is possible.
That's a good way to put it. You need to know what the worst case looks like, not just the best case.
And I love that the article doesn't say your neighbor is wrong or that you should ignore them. It says if the plan passes all three questions for you, great. You both win.
Which is a generous way to frame it. The neighbor meant well. The recommendation came from a real place. You're just adding your own filter to it.
So what does running those three questions actually look like in practice? Can someone do that on their own?
Parts of it, yes. But the drug pricing piece in particular gets complicated fast. The tiers, the formularies, the pharmacy you use specifically. The details on what you'd pay in a real bad-health year, those are the pieces where I'd say don't guess. Have someone run those numbers with you.
And the team at American Retirement Advisors does that. You bring your drug list, you bring your doctors' names, and they do the comparing.
That's exactly what the article says. And the deadline is real. Enrollment runs through December 7th, so this isn't a someday conversation.
That's not far off. And I'd imagine a lot of people hear that and think, I'll get to it. And then they don't.
And then they're locked in for another year with a plan that wasn't really chosen for them. It was chosen for their neighbor.
Which might be fine! Or might cost them a lot of money. And they won't know until they're in it.
The whole article is really about that asymmetry. The downside of not checking is potentially pretty significant. The cost of checking is an afternoon and a phone call.
Can I ask you something that I think some listeners might be wondering? What if someone is already on a plan they've been on for a few years and they feel fine about it? Do they still need to do this?
The article doesn't say it that way explicitly, but the whole logic of the piece implies yes, because the plan can change even if you don't. Your drug can move to a different tier. A doctor can leave the network. Plans adjust their terms every year.
So complacency is its own kind of risk.
Quiet but real. You didn't change, but everything around you might have.
What about the specifics of how the out-of-pocket maximums work, or how the tiers are actually structured? Is that something people should try to research on their own, or...
I'd write that down and bring it to an advisor. The exact mechanics of how a specific plan structures its tiers and calculates your maximum exposure, those details vary enough that I wouldn't want someone guessing at it. That's a question for the team.
That's fair. And honestly that's what the article is pointing toward anyway. Not just here's information, but here's a number you can call.
Six-oh-two, two-eight-one, three-eight-nine-eight. That's in the piece. Bring your drug list and your doctors' names, and they'll do the comparing with you.
And if you have questions about how it all works, ask when you call.
Always a good idea to ask upfront. And the invitation in the article is clear: come in, bring your information, and let's work through it together.
You know what I keep thinking about? That couple. Married 38 years. Seven prescriptions versus one pill. They probably sat down at the same kitchen table to figure out Medicare and could have ended up on wildly different plans.
And that's the right outcome. Not matching, but fitting. Each person on the plan that works for them specifically.
It's a little counterintuitive when you're used to doing everything together.
Medicare is one area where individual really does mean individual. The coverage is designed that way for a reason.
And the neighbor thing, I just want to go back to it one more time because I think it's so relatable. People aren't being reckless when they take that advice. They're doing what feels smart.
Someone you trust, who seems to have it figured out, is telling you what worked for them. That's not a bad starting point. The article isn't saying ignore it. It's saying run it through your own filter before you act on it.
Enjoy the conversation, as Ian Schaeffer writes. Then ask yourself three questions.
Which is a gentle way to put it. He's not telling you to distrust your neighbor. He's just saying your neighbor doesn't know your drug list.
Ha. That's true. She definitely doesn't know your drug list.
And she shouldn't have to. That's what the advisors are for.
Alright, if someone is listening to this and they're in the Annual Enrollment window right now, what's the one thing you'd want them to walk away with from today?
Don't make a decision based on someone else's experience. Your doctors, your drugs, your routine, your travel. None of that matches your neighbor's, and the plan that's right for her might cost you real money or leave you without coverage you need.
And December 7th is the deadline. So this is not a topic to let sit on the counter for another week.
Call it the holiday gift that has a firm expiration date. Not very festive, but very real.
Ha! Okay, that is very you.
I stand by it.
That number Eddie just gave you, write it down right now if you haven't already. And while you've got that pen out, go ahead and jot down the same information we talked about a moment ago right underneath it, so it's all in one place when you make the call. Then reach out to the American Retirement Advisors team and let them run those three questions with you before December 7th. It's the kind of conversation that could save you a lot of stress over the next year. You've done harder things than making a phone call.